amuel Edmund Oppenheim (1901-1992) occupies a unique place in the
history of American painting. A thoroughgoing Impressionist, he was
a student of Charles Hawthorne on Cape Cod and Harvey Dunn in New
York. Another strong influence was Walter Biggs, the incomparable
American illustrator whose freely-brushed watercolor paintings graced
most leading magazines in the early decades of the Twentieth Century.
Oppenheim was principally a painter of charming easel pictures which
exude a gracious, mellow poetry. Several motifs recur with frequency
in his oeuvre: mother and child in an idyllic landscape, beautiful
women posing modestly in a gentle Victorian interior, lush floral
still lifes, young ballerinas posing in stage costume, decorous nudes
in a domestic interior.

Portrait of Tammy, 1962.
Oil on canvas, 59 x 30 inches.

Lady in a Pink Hat, 1970.
Oil on canvas, 30 x 25 inches.

The Blue Curtain, 1966.
Oil on canvas, 22 x 30 inches.
|
 |

The Hilltop, 1979.
Oil on canvas, 9 x 12 inches.
But Oppenheim also painted many portraits professionally, strong
in characterization and rich in painterly qualities. These masterly
portraits, hanging in public and private collections throughout
the United States, firmly establish his right to be considered among
the foremost American portraitists. It was his popular portrait
classes at the Art Students League in New York, featuring his electrifying
demonstrations, that created his enduring reputation as a teacher.
I myself was a student in those League classes, and I credit Oppenheim
with awakening my awareness of what painting is all about. From
the very beginning, I set out to emulate the Oppenheim technique.
The soft edges, the flowing brush strokes, the selective focus,
the mystery and elegance of the conception, all this was fascinating.
But behind it all was a solid, honest realism standing firmly on
the bedrock of observation. "Observation is everything,"
he would say. "Look and see what is there. The model is the
teacher in this class. She says nothing, but she tells you everything."
Essential to the technique were two concepts: first, drawing is
the key to painting. Behind everything is accuracy of observation
in drawing and, second, the tonal values must be right. It must
be right in black and white before it can be right in color. Exquisite
color will not save a painting that is faulty in drawing and inaccurate
in value.
He was committed to the concept of the single-sitting portrait
study as the basic discipline. He felt that the urgency of the time
constraint forced the artist to concentrate on essentials.
We worked on a white canvas, mixing on a white palette. We made
no preliminary drawing in another medium, but rather proceeded directly
with the brush, blocking in the architecture of the head as simply
but accurately as possible. Ten percent of the total working time
was to be devoted to this drawing.
Then we proceeded to lay in our main tones, working with the largest
brush possible, stating the darks first, then the halftones, finally
the lights. And always the values the values! The values
must be right! As he made his way among the forest of easels in
the class, the commentary was succinct and direct, and invariably
involved the values. "The eyes are too dark!" or "The
highlight on the forehead is much too light!" "Look over
there and see what is there!"

Woman with Flowered Background,
1988.
Oil on canvas, 30 x 24 inches.

The Age of Innocence, 1950.
Oil on canvas, 57 x 40 inches. |
Samuel Edmund Oppenheim left an enduring legacy of student/disciples,
and a body of joyous Impressionist paintings that continue to delight
and instruct.
|